About this course

The course focuses on the documentation, interpretation, analysis, and management of historic parks, gardens, cultural landscapes, and other heritage environments. Students work with the historical development of a site through the study of its spatial structure, historical sources, and changing landscape layers. The course introduces key concepts such as conservation, restoration, reconstruction, authenticity, and relevant legislation, and examines how historic green spaces can be managed, developed, and communicated in a professionally grounded way.

Digital methods are integrated as important tools for analysis, interpretation, and communication. Students will work with selected technologies such as 3D modelling, 3D visualization, reality capture, digital storytelling, and immersive technologies including Virtual Reality. Depending on the case, the course may also incorporate other technlogies amd methods such as Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence (AI) where relevant. These tools are used to strengthen understanding of historical layers, support interpretation, visulaization and improve the communication of heritage values. The purpose of using technology in the course is not simply technical training in itself, but to explore how digital tools can enhance understanding of historic landscapes, make historical layers and development over time more visible, and support more informed conservation and management decisions.

The course is organized around a case that is specified for each course cycle. The VR-Lab is used as an arena for testing interpretations, constrcuting scenarios, and hypotheses related to the historical development and future management of the site.

Learning outcome

Students who have completed the course are expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes.

Knowledge: Students have knowledge of key concepts, methods, and relevant legislation related to the documentation, interpretation, conservation, restoration, reconstruction, management, and communication of historic parks, gardens, cultural landscapes, and other heritage environments. They understand how historical layers can be identified and analysed through historical sources, field registration, and spatial investigation. They also have knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of digital methods such as 3D modelling, 3D visualization, reality capture, Virtual Reality, and related technologies in heritage analysis, interpretation, and communication.

Skills: Students are able to identify, register, and analyse historic landscape structures and heritage values, and to produce a professionally grounded historical analysis based on relevant source material and site-based investigation. They are able to use selected digital tools and methods to visualize historical layers, test interpretations, scenarios, and hypotheses, and communicate conservation, restoration, and management proposals. They are also able to justify their methodological choices and critically assess how digital representations influence interpretation and presentation.

General competence: Students are able to critically reflect on authenticity, uncertainty, interpretation, and professional responsibility in work with sites of cultural and historical value. They can communicate heritage values, historical development, and management alternatives to both professional and broader audiences through appropriate visual, spatial, and digital forms of representation. They are able to work independently and collaboratively in a case-based process that integrates historical understanding, conservation practice, and digital methods.

  • Learning activities

    Teaching is based on a combination of lectures, seminars, site visits, lab work, and case based project work, with individual and or group supervision. The course combines a theoretical component and a project based component in which students work with the documentation, analysis, interpretation, and communication of historic parks, gardens, cultural landscapes, and other heritage environments. As part of the course, students also complete assignments connected to the digital track, intended to develop practical competence in relevant digital tools and methods such as 3D modelling, 3D visualization, reality capture, digital storytelling, and immersive technologies. These assignments are designed to support the students in mastering and critically applying digital methods in relation to the historical case. Students are required to complete and submit digital track assignments connected to the tools and methods introduced in the course.
  • Teaching support

    Supervision during the course.
  • Syllabus

    Reading List

    The reading list consists of literature on digital heritage, documentation and visualization, as well as theory and practice related to historic gardens, parks, and cultural landscapes. In addition, international guidelines and charters are included.

    1. Digital heritage, documentation and visualization

    Letellier, Robin; Schmid, Werner; LeBlanc, François. 2007. Recording, Documentation, and Information Management for the Conservation of Heritage Places: Guiding Principles (Getty Conservation Institute).https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/guiding_principles.pdf

    The London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage. Version 2.1, 2009.https://londoncharter.org/

    Historic England. 2017. Photogrammetric Applications for Cultural Heritage: Guidance for Good Practice.https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/photogrammetric-applications-for-cultural-heritage

    Champion, Erik (ed.). 2021. Virtual Heritage: A Guide (Ubiquity Press).https://www.ubiquitypress.com/books/85/files/26941223-d133-46d8-9acf-705558fdc8c6.pdf

    2. Historic gardens, parks, and cultural landscapes (Scandinavian literature)

    Bruun, Magne. 2007. Norwegian Gardens Through a Thousand Years. Andresen & Butenschøn.

    Fischer, Jacob. 2011. Manor House Gardens.www.fremtidensherregård.dk

    Flinck, Maria. 2013. Historic Gardens: Preserving a Changing Cultural Heritage. Carlsson.

    3. Cultural heritage management and landscape theory (international literature)

    Taylor, Ken; St Clair, Archer; Mitchell, Nora J. 2015. Conserving Cultural Landscapes. Routledge.

    Watkins, John; Wright, Tom. 2007. The Management & Maintenance of Historic Parks, Gardens & Landscapes. Frances Lincoln.

    Bloemers, Tom; Kars, Henk; Van der Valk, Arnold; Wijnen, Mies. 2010. The Cultural Landscape & Heritage Paradox. Amsterdam University Press.

    4. International charters and guidelines

    UNESCO. 2008. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.www.whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf

    ICOMOS. 1982. The Florence Charter (Historic Gardens).http://www.international.icomos.org/e_floren.htm

    Australia ICOMOS. 1992. The Burra Charter: Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value.http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/research_resources/charters/charter45.html

    5. Supplementary literature

    In addition, literature related to the specific case area will be included, as well as supplementary texts on digital methods, documentation, analysis, visualization, and reconstruction.

  • Prerequisites

    LAA211 and both LAD100 and LAD202 or equivalent
  • Assessment method

    Portfolio assessment and submission of a final group assignment. A-F

    Term paper Karakterregel: Letter grades
  • About use of AI

    The applicable usage of AI in this course falls under category K2: AI can be used for idea generation and language proofreading. The use of AI should be described with a brief explanation of which programs you have used and how the program is used in the text. The student\ group is responsible for the final content of the text after language proofreading has been completed. The use of AI should also be in line with the guidelines for the use of AI at NMBU.

    Descriptions of AI-category codes.

  • Examiner scheme

    The assignment will be evaluated by an external cencor
  • Mandatory activity

    All excursions,field work and presentations. 80% of lectures, seminars and group instructions.
  • Notes

    Emnets innhold er under utvikling.
  • Teaching hours

    Lectures: 20 hours, Fieldwork 40 hours, Seminar: 10 hours, Exercises 30 hours
  • Preferential right

    M-LA
  • Admission requirements

    Minimum requirements for entrance to higher education in Norway (generell studiekompetanse)