APL360 Planning for sustainable urban regions
Showing course contents for the educational year 2019 - 2020 .
Course responsible: Jin Xue
ECTS credits: 15
Faculty: Faculty of Landscape and Society
Teaching language: EN
Limits of class size:
Teaching exam periods:
This course starts in Spring parallels. This course has teaching / evaluation in Spring parallels.
Course frequency: Annually
First time: Study year 2010-2011
The overall aim of the course is to introduce students how urban regional planning can enhance sustainable development through land use planning, transport infrastructure provision, conservation strategies, and location of settlements and industry. The course will introduce urban sustainability debates and provide a critical perspective on the dominant urban sustainable development paradigm; discuss the mechanisms through which planning strategies can have positive and negative impacts on both environmental and social sustainability; and stimulate creative planning thinking and approaches to mitigate climate change and improve social justice. As a base for this, key normative elements in the concept of sustainability will be discussed. These topics will be illustrated by focusing on key spatial elements at the urban regional level including urban structure and travel behavior, transport infrastructure provision and evaluation, and residential development.
The aim is that students, upon completing the course, have acquired knowledge about, understanding of and skills in the use of relevant concepts, theories and planning strategies relevant to spatial development in urban regions, and that they are able to produce analyses, critique and proposals for solutions concerning land use and transport infrastructure in urban regions, especially in a perspective of sustainability, climate and social justice.
Lectures, seminar, project work.
Each project group will be assigned a supervisor to facilitate their group work. The course responsible will normally be available via email.
Brenner, N., Marcuse, P. & Mayer, M. (2009): Cities for people, not for profit. City, 13(2):176 -184. (8 p.)
Harvey, D. (2008): The right to the city. New Left Review, 53:23-40. (23 p.)
Christaller, W. (1933/1966): Central Places in Southern Germany, s. 14-83. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966. (70 p.)
Davoudi, C. (2008). Conceptions of the city-region: a critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, 161(2), pp. 51-60. (10 p.)
Dicken, Peter, 1990: Spatial organisation of economic activities: a Simplified model, Chap 1. In: Dicken, Peter, 1990: Location in space, s. 15-48. (34 p.)
Theme 1: Land use and transport
Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7-21. (15 p.)
Næss, P. (2015). Built Environment, Causality and Travel. Transport Reviews, 35 (3), pp. 275-291. (17 p.)
Næss, P. (2012): Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5:21-45. (25 p.)
Næss, P., Næss, T. & Strand, A. (2011): Oslo¿s farewell to urban sprawl. European Planning Studies, 19(1): 113-139. (27 p.)
Banister, D. (2008): The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15: 73-80. (8 p.
Theme 2: Transport planning and elucidation
Wegener, M. (2014): Land-Use transport interaction models. In: FISCHER, M. M. & NIJKAMP, P. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. s. 741-743. (3 p.)
Brems et al. (2007): Trafikmodeller. Arbejdsnotat til infrastrukturkommisionen, s. 1-14. Lyngby: Danmarks tekniske universitet. (14 p.)
Nicolaisen, Morten Skou; Driscoll, Patrick Arthur (2014): Ex-post evaluations of demand forecast accuracy: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 34(4): 540-557. (18 p.
Næss, P. & Strand, A. (2015). Traffic forecasting at ¿strategic¿, ¿tactical¿ and ¿operational¿ level: A differentiated methodology is necessary. disP, 51(2): 41-48. (8 p.)
Banister D. & Hickman R. (2012). Thinking the unthinkable. Transport Policy, 29:283-293. (11 p.)
Theme 3: Sustainability-oriented planning in urban region
Holgersen, S. & Malm, a. (2015). Green fix" as crisis management. Or, in which world is Malmö the world's greenest city? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 97, pp. 275-. (20 p.)
Xue, J. (2017). Eco-metropolis planning conditioned by the growth ideology: the case of Greater Copenhagen. Urban Design and Planning, 1-10.
Xue, J. (2014): Sustainable housing development: decoupling or degrowth? A comparative study of Copenhagen and Hangzhou. Environment and Planning C, 33: 620-639. (20 p.)
Xue, J.; Walnum, J.; Aall, C. & Næss, P. (2016). Two Contrasting Scenarios for a Zero-Emission Future in a High-Consumption Society. Sustainability, 9, 20; doi:10.3390/su9010020.
Mouratidis, K. (2017). Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban studies.
Fainstein, S. (2009): Chapter 1. Planning and the just city. In: P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter & J. Steil (eds.), Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice, 19-39. London, Routledge. (21 p.)
Næss, P. & Xue, J. (2016): Housing standards, environmental sustainability and social welfare. In: Næss, P. & Price, L. (eds.) Crisis System: A Critical realist and critical environmental critique of contemporary economics, pp. 130-148 London: Routledge. (19 p.)
Lectures, seminar, project work. A minimum of 80% attendance is required.
The assessment will be based primarily on the project group assignment, but it will also take into regard active participation in the lecture sessions. The evaluation of the project group assignment will be made by an external censor. The project group assignment will be evaluated in the A-F grading scale.
Minimum Requirements for entrance to higher education in Norway (general admission)
Reduction of credits:
There is no overlap with other courses.
Type of course:
Ca. 100 hours
The external censor evaluates and grades the project group assignments. A meeting will be organized where the censor gives oral feedback to the project groups attending the meeting.
Examination details: Continuous exam: A - E / F